Download [PDF, 14 MB] the proposed plan change
We all want healthy rivers, profitable, sustainable farms and strong communities. Over the past two decades, the Waikato community has consistently identified water quality as the top issue for our region. Healthy Rivers/Wai Ora: Proposed Waikato Regional Plan Change 1 is our opportunity to protect the environment and ensure that what we value as a community is here for future generations.
Developed alongside iwi and key stakeholders, the proposed plan change is one of the largest plan changes of its kind in New Zealand, applying to approximately 10,000 properities and covering a land area of 1.1M hectares within the Waikato and Waipā river catchments.
The proposed plan seeks to reduce the amount of contaminants entering into the Waikato and Waipā catchments to achieve our Vision and Strategy/Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato of making the river swimmable and viable for food collection along the entire length of the river. The Vision and Strategy was adopted by the Government as part of Treaty Settlement legislation.
It also gives effect to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2014. The regional council has a legal requirement to give effect to both of these.(external link)
The proposed plan includes all rural landowners within the Waikato River and Waipā River catchments. New rules will complement existing rules in the Waikato Regional Plan, and existing rules will continue to apply, e.g. farm dairy effluent rules, earthwork rules and point-source discharge rules.
The proposed rules include:
A detailed summary of the proposed rules can be found here [PDF, 486 KB].
Following notification of Proposed Plan Change 1, Pare Hauraki raised concerns with Waikato Regional Council that they had not been consulted with in the manner required by the RMA. Council withdrew part of the proposed plan change on 3 December 2016 in order for consultation to take place.
On 10 April 2018, council notified Variation 1 to Proposed Plan Change 1 for public submissions. Variation 1 makes amendments to Proposed Plan Change 1. Here’s a summary of the changes:
This supporting document shows all of the changes between the Variation 1 and Proposed Plan Change 1. It also shows how everything will fit once the two are brought back together. You can read it here [PDF, 26 MB].
While the variation follows a separate submission process to the rest of the proposed plan, it is intended to bring these two processes together before the start of hearings so that there will only be one hearings and decisions process.
So, where are we now? This diagram might help:
Want to read the full Proposed Plan Change 1? You can read it here [PDF, 1.2 MB].
Curious about the evaluation behind each part of the proposed plan? A Section 32 Evaluation Report analyses the provisions in the proposed plan change against the Resource Management Act (RMA) and provides some background information about the different parts of the plan. Read the full report here [PDF, 1.6 MB].
You can also read the Section 32 referenced documents here.
Additional documents include the Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Vegetable Production 2014 [PDF, 1.5 MB]
Following notification on 22 October 2016, 1023 submissions were received on Plan Change 1 raising a range of issues and providing suggestions on how the proposed plan change could be improved. There were also 61 submissions received on Variation 1.
These submissions have been summarised and the decisions and changes requested, or inferred, from each of the submissions can be found here.
The plan change has been developed using an innovative collaborative process working alongside our iwi partners. Those who are most affected by the changes have been represented by a Collaborative Stakeholders Group (CSG), and they've been at the table developing the policy and providing input and feedback from their communities and sectors.
Want to know more about the CSG and how they developed the policy? Read about its members and workshops here.
The Collaborative Stakeholder Group worked closely with a Technical Advisory Group, an impartial, advisory group of specialists who provided technical information to them and the project steering group. They collated, analysed, summarised and presented environmental, social, cultural and economic information about the rivers and the consequences of different land management scenarios.